Advanced Method of Transient Microwave Photoconductivity (AMTMP), experimental


First, some history...

1988 - the AMTMP (at that time I did not call it AMTMP!) was developed by S.Grabtchak and G.Novikov in the Institute of Chemical Physics of Russian Academy of Science, Chernogolovka, Moscow Region, Russia. Worked well for the first realization. (Is still there, I guess...) It took several years to built it...

1993 - the second realization of AMTMP. The method and the algorithm were improved by S.Grabtchak and M.Cocivera in the University of Guelph, Canada. This setup was designed in tree months.

1994 - a lot of work on automation and S/N improvement (same authors, same place).

??? - where and when will be the next setup? (It's up to you!)


A semiconductor sample inserted into a microwave cavity can be characterized by two parameters of a resonance curve namely a resonance frequency and a cavity quality factor which is related to a bandwidth at a half maximum of amplitude. This curve is shown in black and corresponds to time t0 before the illumination. The short illumination pulse creates extra carriers in the sample and changes the real and an imaginary parts of dielectric constant. This causes a perturbation of the resonance curve and manifests itself in a shift of the resonance frequency and in the broadening of the resonance curve. The resonance curve immediately after the illumination is shown in magenta and denoted as time t1. During the decay of excess carriers due to recombination processes the resonance curve gradually returns to its initial position and parameters. Two intermediate curves corresponding to instants t2 and t3 after the excitation are shown in green and in red correspondingly. One can see that there are two contributions to the signal observed at the initial resonance frequency and this single kinetics is what is measured in the traditional method of microwave photoconductivity. The first due to the change in the bandwidth is known as a photoconductivity and usually is related to a change in the imaginary part of dielectric constant. The second due to the shift of the resonance frequency is known as a photodielectric effect and usually is related to a change in the real part of dielectric constant. If the precautions against the shift of the resonance frequency are not made the interpretation of the observed kinetics will be ambiguous. Even if this is done and the observed signal is proportional only to the change of the cavity quality factor it is not possible to distinguish the conductivity due to free electrons before the first trapping occurs from the conductivity of electrons after reaching the thermal equilibrium with traps. This distinction is of great importance because in the first case the kinetics gives the true lifetime but in the second the observed time constant is related to the rate of release from traps present.
The Advanced Method of Transient Microwave Photoconductivity (AMTMP) permits registration of both the photoconductivity and the photodielectric effect. Photoresponses are measured at a number of frequencies around the initial resonance frequency. The typical behavior of kinetics is shown at some frequencies. Next, the values corresponding to the same time are chosen from all kinetics and plotted versus frequency. As an example three such curves for time t1, t2, t3 after the excitation are shown. The last step is to realize that each curve is a difference signal between the original resonance curve with known parameters and the current resonance curve with unknown parameters. Fitting the difference signal to the difference between two Lorentzian curves gives values of resonance frequency and cavity quality factor for each instant. Therefore, two kinetics one of the shift of the resonance frequency and another the change of the cavity quality factor are the final results of the AMTMP.


In fact the central part of this method can be thought of as a kind of time-resolved spectrometer with an excitation at one frequency (UV or visible range) and responses measured at microwave frequencies (but within very narrow range compare with typical spectrometers). The signal is produced by the signal generator (illumination of sample in the microwave cavity). It causes the absorption of microwave power generated by a microwave source. The changes in a microwave power in time are registered by a detector diode in an appropriate detector mount (microwave power-to-voltage transducer). The voltage produced by a diode is registered by the oscilloscope. The kinetics corresponding to various microwave frequencies of interest must be measured sequentially by the scope and stored for the subsequent analysis.


The schematic diagram of the microwave system is shown in the next picture. The microwave source was a 20 mW Wiltron 68137B synthesized sweep generator (2.0-20.0 GHz) connected to a PC 486DX4 by an IEEE-488 interface. A three port circulator WFX-C (Microwave Resources Inc.) was used which simplified the tuning procedure of getting the Lorentz form of a dark resonance profile. All microwave signals were measured using a DT8012 (Herotek Inc.) detector diode with a time constant corresponding to ~ 1.3 nsec. The signal from the detector diode was recorded by a 100 MHz TDS 320 (Tektronix) oscilloscope connected to the computer by an IEEE-488 interface. The time resolution in the experiment was limited by a time constant of the cavity used (about 60 nsec). Since it is possible to determine a time constant for a physical process that is at least 2.2 times larger than the maximum instrumental time constant, the minimum decay time constant that could be determined was 130 ns. The light source used in these experiments was an LN 1000 nitrogen (337 nm) pulsed laser (Photochemical Research Assoc. Inc.) with a pulse width of 600 ps. The maximum incident laser power was 6.5E15 photons/pulse cm2 . The illuminated area of the sample had a rectangular rather then a circular shape with dimensions 1.7x5.5 mm. It was chosen to satisfy more the requirement to the specific sample geometry (long narrow strip) after the illumination. Laser power was measured using an ED-100A joulemeter (Opticon Corp.).


Back to Research Page

Back to Serguei's Home Page