
Many
commerical devices exist which are built on this material, such as
thermal switches on motors (when the temperature rises above a set
point, the resistance through the switch increases, shutting off the
motor) and constant temperature heating devices (when it reaches the
set point temperature, an increase in current will cause the
temperature to rise, but this will cause an increase in resistance,
which decreases the current, which decreases the temperature and the
device becomes self-regulating at that temperature). In 1992,
worldwide production of BaTiO3 thermistors exceeded a half
billion units with European companies such as Philips and Seimens
leading the way.
However, in spite of all of this interest, an accurate model of
the cause of the PTCR effect remains a contentious issue. One group
of models assumes that a two-dimensional layer of interfacial
acceptor states occurs at the grain surface, which may be intrinsic
in origin (simply a result of the termination of the crystal lattice)
or extrinisic due to the surface segregation of impurities or the ion
absorption of O. The second model assumes that the barrier states
arise from the Ba vacancy-rich region which originates due to
diffusion during the sintering process. The grain boundary region is
seen to be an n-i-n type junction and no experiment has clearly
answered why. Current debate still centers around these ideas and
further development in the PTCR materials can be aided by a clearer
understanding of the origin of this effect.
We
are collaborating with the group of Prof. Anatoly Belous from the
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry in Ukraine to reach a
better understanding. They fabricate these materials and have even
started a small company called OXIDE to market devices such as these
amongst others. We have been using Scanning
Tunneling Microscopy (STM) and Spectroscopy (STS) to probe the
interfacial region to find these states and more accurately
characterize them. We have observed a rather anomolous behaviour when
scanning the tip bias voltage during tunneling. This hysterises
effect is observable on some locations on the surface and not on
others. In the image on the left, the site at point B shows
hysteresis while the site at A does not. We have employed a new
spectroscopic method, involving a voltage step/current relaxation
method. A sudden step in the tip bias voltage induces a change in the
tunneling current. We measure the rate of relaxation to this new
tunneling level and find that at times, the surface relaxation occurs
in microseconds while at other places it is characterized by a time
constant of 100's of milliseconds. It is at these locations that the
hystresis is observed. The image to the right shows the two voltage
step relaxation spectra for the two sites in the STM image. The
current at point A response time is limited by the electronics, while
that at B is controlled by the charging kinetics of the trapping
sites located at B.
The
above experiments were performed under atmospheric conditions but we
have recently performed some further experiments in a controlled
atmosphere environment. When a sample is placed into a UHV
environment and heated to drive off any adsorbed gases, the resulting
sample shows no hysteresis effects at any location. By contrast, when
1 torr of O2 is admitted, the sites manifest increasing
hysteresis when the bias potential is swept between -2 V and +2 V.
Apparently, these trapping states are closely related to adsorbed
oxygen, perhaps in an ionic form. And since, the PTCR effect only is
shown when the sample has been processed in an oxidizing environment,
it is reasonable to presume that these interfacial sites that have
been identified are closely related to those responsible for the PTCR
effect.